In a tense government meeting, officials confronted the leadership of the Secret Service regarding its handling of a recent incident deemed a \"colossal failure.\" The questioning was marked by a series of yes-or-no inquiries, with the Secret Service admitting to the failure and acknowledging that the tragedy was preventable.

The dialogue escalated as committee members expressed frustration over the Secret Service's transparency, particularly highlighting the necessity of issuing a subpoena to compel attendance. One member pointedly questioned whether the agency's actions could be considered transparent, given the circumstances surrounding the subpoena.

Further scrutiny was directed at the timing of the release of the Secret Service's opening statement, which was leaked to major news outlets hours before it was provided to the committee. This prompted accusations of political maneuvering, with one member dismissing the explanation as insufficient.

The committee also sought clarity on the cooperation level of the Secret Service, to which the agency responded affirmatively. However, concerns lingered regarding the completeness of the information provided, particularly a request for a list of law enforcement personnel present during the incident.

The meeting underscored significant tensions between the committee and the Secret Service, raising questions about accountability and the agency's commitment to transparency in the wake of a critical incident.