Residents of Pocatello voiced strong concerns during a recent city council meeting regarding a proposed development project near Ammon Park. The plan, which includes the construction of 86 townhome units, has sparked significant debate over safety, traffic, and community impact.

Local residents, including retired firefighters and community leaders, expressed fears about the safety implications of adding new families to the area, particularly after dark. Concerns were raised about existing traffic issues, with several speakers highlighting dangerous conditions on streets like Amherst and Lakeview, where sidewalks are lacking and visibility is poor. One resident recounted a recent incident where a child tripped over a concrete spill while walking in the street, underscoring the potential hazards posed by increased traffic from the new development.

Critics of the project accused city officials and developers of prioritizing profit over community welfare. Elva Worley, a long-time resident and former Cub Scout leader, emphasized the importance of Ammon Park as a safe space for families and questioned the developer's commitment to the community. She argued that the proposed changes would not benefit local residents but rather serve the interests of the developers.

In response, Joel Dixon, representing the development team, clarified that the project would consist of townhomes, not apartments, and emphasized that the development would adhere to city codes. He acknowledged the traffic concerns but noted that the proposed infrastructure improvements, including sidewalks and pedestrian paths, would enhance safety. Dixon also mentioned that the development would include a homeowners association to manage common areas and amenities.

City officials reassured residents that traffic studies had been conducted and that the roads would be adequate to handle the anticipated increase in vehicles. They emphasized that the development would not only provide housing but also improve local infrastructure.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that while some residents remain opposed to the project, others are open to compromise, recognizing the need for development in the area. The council is expected to deliberate further on the proposal, weighing community concerns against the rights of property owners to develop their land.