In a recent government meeting, significant discussions centered around the demolition and reconstruction of a historic property that has undergone substantial changes. Austin Ainsworth, representing the property, confirmed that one of the two historic buildings connected by a breezeway has been completely demolished, leaving only a smokehouse and the breezeway intact.

Ainsworth emphasized that the demolition was conducted manually, without heavy machinery, to preserve the remaining structures. He noted that while the living quarters dating back to the early 1800s are no longer present, the smokehouse was deemed structurally sound and has been preserved as part of the site's history.

The proposal for new construction aims to replicate the historic building's appearance while adhering to the guidelines set forth by the local commission. These guidelines encourage new constructions to be architecturally compatible with the historic character of the district without attempting to replicate historic designs. Ainsworth expressed the intent to ensure that the new buildings blend with the district's character while showcasing contemporary construction methods.

The meeting also highlighted some confusion regarding the extent of the demolition, with members clarifying the status of the remaining structures and the definition of the breezeway. Ainsworth clarified that the remaining structures are considered part of a single building due to their historical documentation, despite their distinct functions as a smokehouse and living quarters.

As the discussions progressed, questions arose about the permitting process for the reconstruction, particularly whether it would require one or multiple permits given the extent of the demolition. The meeting underscored the complexities involved in balancing historical preservation with contemporary development in the area.