Controversy erupts over unpermitted roof installation

In a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding a roofing project at 3230 Street, where a slate roof was replaced with asphalt without the necessary permits. The discussion centered around the application for a certificate of appropriateness for the new roof and the installation of solar panels.

Commissioners expressed frustration over the lack of communication from the roofing company, which misled officials during a previous meeting by presenting outdated photographs and failing to disclose that the roof had already been replaced. This miscommunication has raised questions about the integrity of the company involved and the quality of the work performed.

During the meeting, it was revealed that the new roof installation did not comply with the commission's standards, particularly regarding the visibility of solar panel conduits, which were supposed to be concealed. The commissioners noted that had the application been presented correctly, they likely would have approved the roof replacement, given the condition of the original slate roof.

Public comments reflected a mix of support and opposition to the project. Some community members called for stricter oversight, suggesting that an inspector should evaluate the work done, especially since it was completed without a permit. Others echoed the commissioners' sentiments, advocating for the authority to reject the current installation due to the mishandling of the project.

The meeting concluded with a consensus that while the roof replacement might have been acceptable under different circumstances, the procedural violations and lack of transparency from the roofing company warranted further scrutiny. The commission is expected to deliberate on the next steps regarding the approval of the roofing project and the solar panel installation in future meetings.