City official calls for termination of controversial contract

During a recent city council meeting, a significant discussion emerged regarding the employment contract of the chief strategy officer, which has raised concerns about its validity and adherence to city code. A council member called for the termination of the contract, asserting that it is inconsistent with regulations that govern the hiring and firing of key city positions, specifically the city manager, city attorney, and city magistrate.

The council member highlighted that the current contract, amended on February 20, 2024, was improperly established, as the chief strategy officer was appointed by the former city manager, Rick Horst, on April 1, 2024. This appointment, they argued, presents a conflict of interest, particularly since the new city manager, Mister Bitter, had not been involved in the hiring process. The council member pointed out that the contract includes a severance clause that could cost the city approximately $145,000 if the current city manager sought to terminate the chief strategy officer's employment, effectively shielding the officer from accountability.

The city attorney reportedly indicated that the council has the authority to amend employment agreements under the city code, which allows for broad contracting powers. However, the council member expressed concern that this interpretation undermines the principles of the council-manager form of government, which is intended to promote transparency and prevent practices such as cronyism and influence peddling.

The meeting underscored the ongoing debate about governance practices within the city, with the council member referencing a 2018 document from the League of Arizona Cities and Towns that criticized the potential for unethical practices in government hiring processes. The discussion reflects a growing scrutiny of administrative decisions and the need for accountability in city management.