In a recent government meeting, community members voiced strong opposition to a proposed building variance that would allow for the construction of a large structure near Highway 61. Concerns were raised about the size and impact of the proposed building, which one resident compared to the combined dimensions of the Gunflint Tavern and Mayhew, asserting that it would be significantly larger than existing structures in the area.

Julia, a local resident, emphasized her objections, stating that the proposed building would not only violate the 130-foot setback from the highway but also disrupt the character of the neighborhood. She urged the board to deny the variance, highlighting that the previous variance granted in 2011 had expired and was no longer applicable.

Peter Bennett, another resident, echoed these sentiments, criticizing the proposal as a \"false dilemma\" that misrepresented the options available to the developers. He suggested alternative building plans that would be more in line with the community's character, such as constructing smaller cottages or single-story buildings that would blend into the landscape. Bennett also raised concerns about the potential long-term implications of granting the variance, warning that it could set a precedent for future developments that would alter the character of the road.

The meeting underscored a clear community consensus against the proposed variance, with residents calling for the board to take a firm stance to preserve the area's integrity. As discussions continue, the board faces the challenge of balancing development interests with community concerns.