Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

SEC Proposals Risk Major Disruption to US Capital Markets

June 20, 2024 | Financial Services: House Committee, Standing Committees - House & Senate, Congressional Hearings Compilation



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

SEC Proposals Risk Major Disruption to US Capital Markets
During a recent government meeting, experts voiced significant concerns regarding the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) proposed market structure changes, emphasizing the need for careful analysis before implementation. The SEC's interconnected proposals, which lack a comprehensive evaluation of their cumulative effects, could drastically alter market dynamics and potentially render some regulations unnecessary.

One of the key proposals discussed was the modification of tick sizes under Regulation NMS. While there is industry support for a limited adjustment to a half-penny tick size for certain stocks, stakeholders urged the SEC to adopt a data-driven, incremental approach. This would allow for thorough analysis of the changes' effectiveness before further adjustments are made.

Conversely, the SEC's order competition proposal raised alarms due to its potential to introduce operational complexities and risks to market stability. Critics highlighted that the mandated auctions could negatively impact liquidity and execution quality, labeling the proposal as an untested solution to an unproven issue.

Additionally, the SEC's best execution proposal aims to establish a commission-level standard for broker-dealers. However, experts noted that much of this proposal overlaps with existing obligations and may not address any actual problems effectively. They argued that enhancing oversight of self-regulatory organizations and enforcing current rules would be a more prudent approach.

The meeting underscored the importance of prioritizing the interests of asset owners and issuers in policy discussions, as they often lack representation compared to intermediaries. Experts cautioned that any major reforms should be justified by clear evidence of harm to market end users, warning that hasty regulatory changes could lead to unintended negative consequences.

As the SEC considers these proposals, stakeholders are advocating for a thoughtful and empirical approach to ensure the health and efficiency of U.S. capital markets.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting