Controversial porch enclosure sparks preservation debate

During a recent government meeting, significant discussions centered around a property application that revealed unpermitted construction work. Initially submitted for a screened porch, the application evolved as staff discovered that the side porch had been fully enclosed without the necessary preservation permit. This enclosure, which deviated from the property's original open design as of 2016, was not disclosed to the new owners, who were unaware of the violation.

The guidelines permit the enclosure of side porches, provided that the historic features remain visible and the design retains an open appearance. Staff emphasized that successful enclosures typically maintain original porch posts and incorporate windows or glass doors, ensuring the structure still reads as a porch. To rectify the violation, staff recommended that the owners submit revised plans within 90 days that align with these design guidelines.

Additionally, the meeting addressed a proposed rear screen porch addition. While the design generally adhered to guidelines, it presented two issues: it was wider than the historic house and too close to an existing garage. The proposed addition would extend nearly four feet beyond the house and overlap the garage by about two feet. However, staff deemed the modest width increase and shallow overlap acceptable, given the existing structures' configurations.

Staff made two recommendations: to approve the rear screen porch addition, contingent on material approval, and to disapprove the retention of the enclosed side porch, citing non-compliance with specific design sections. They urged that corrective plans be submitted within 90 days, with completion of the approved design required by March 3, 2025. Public comments from neighbors were also noted, indicating community interest in the proceedings.