Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

City Council Extends Moratorium on Controversial Housing Law

July 09, 2024 | Whittier City, Los Angeles County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City Council Extends Moratorium on Controversial Housing Law
In a recent city council meeting, the Whittier City Council voted unanimously to extend a moratorium on housing developments permitted under Senate Bill 9 (SB 9), which allows for lot splits and the construction of up to four units on single-family residential lots. The extension, lasting 10 months and 15 days, will keep the moratorium in place until May 27, 2025, providing additional time for ongoing legal challenges to the legislation to be resolved.

The council's decision follows a ruling by the Los Angeles Superior Court that deemed SB 9 unlawful as it applies to charter cities, a classification that includes Whittier. The city, along with others, filed a petition against the bill shortly after its implementation in January 2022, citing concerns over local control and community character.

Community Development Director Ben Pongetti highlighted that the moratorium would not affect existing projects that were already in process prior to the initial moratorium approved in May. He noted that only a small number of applications—approximately eight units—are currently in the pipeline, which will continue to be processed under the previous directive.

Council members expressed their support for the extension, emphasizing the need to protect local interests while the legal situation unfolds. The council retains the option to extend the moratorium further if necessary, depending on the court's timeline for resolving the appeal filed by the state attorney general.

The public hearing on the matter saw no speakers, indicating a lack of immediate public opposition or support during this session. The council's decision reflects ongoing tensions between state housing policies and local governance, as communities grapple with the implications of increased density in traditionally single-family neighborhoods.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal