Concerns rise over controversial pipeline route decisions

During a recent government meeting, community members expressed significant concerns regarding proposed infrastructure plans involving the installation of a new pipeline. The discussions highlighted confusion over the feasibility and environmental implications of the options presented by the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA).

One resident, Anthony Cantino, criticized the MWRA's proposal to drill a four-foot hole under the river, which would involve removing 35,000 cubic feet of earth. Cantino argued that this method seemed illogical compared to an alternative option that would run the pipeline beneath a newly constructed bridge, which he believed would be less disruptive and more practical.

Cantino emphasized his frustration with the MWRA's lack of clear justification for their chosen route, particularly in light of environmental concerns that were reportedly prioritized over the bridge option. He urged the MWRA to address these issues in their upcoming final presentation, expressing hope that they would provide a satisfactory explanation.

Another resident, Dora Hallett, also raised environmental concerns, referencing a report from 2023-2024 that outlined potential impacts. The meeting underscored the community's desire for transparency and thorough consideration of environmental factors in the decision-making process.

Officials acknowledged the importance of the pipeline, noting that it serves a critical function in the area without a backup system. They expressed appreciation for the public's input and assured attendees that their concerns would be taken into account as the project moves forward. The MWRA is expected to return next month for a final presentation, where these issues will be further discussed.