In a recent virtual meeting of the Multnomah County Board of Commissioners, significant concerns were raised regarding the planned opening of a county deflection center in the Buckman neighborhood. The meeting, which was streamed live on YouTube, featured public testimony from residents, many of whom expressed fears about the center's potential impact on community safety and transparency in the planning process.

Commissioner Sharon Myron's resolution to pause the opening of the deflection center was a focal point of the discussions. Testimonies from local parents and community members highlighted a lack of clear operational plans and transparency from the county regarding the center's implementation. Concerns were voiced about the rushed timeline for opening, with some residents questioning the necessity of a September 1 deadline that they believe lacks justification.

Miles Rookelin, a parent from Escuela Viva, articulated the community's desire for a thoughtful approach to the center's establishment, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive plan that includes community input and addresses safety concerns. Other speakers echoed this sentiment, calling for a pause to allow for proper planning and collaboration with local stakeholders.

Supporters of the deflection center, however, argued for its potential benefits in providing necessary services for individuals struggling with substance use disorders. Chris Pence, a board member of the Buckman Community Association, acknowledged the safety concerns but urged the county to move forward with the center, emphasizing the urgent need for such services in the community.

The meeting also addressed broader issues of transparency and accountability, with several speakers criticizing the county's handling of the planning process. David Watnik, representing Escuela Viva, pointed out the absence of a safety management plan and raised concerns about the lack of public engagement in decision-making.

As the board continues to navigate these complex issues, the community remains divided on the best path forward for the deflection center, with many calling for a more measured and inclusive approach to ensure both safety and effective service delivery. The board is expected to revisit the resolution and public concerns in future meetings.