Concerns over the proposed location of a new crisis center near a children's school and recreational facilities dominated discussions at a recent government meeting. Residents expressed apprehension about the safety implications of having a facility that serves vulnerable populations situated next to the Mid Columbia Children's Council Early Education School, which caters to infants and toddlers.

One resident, who frequently visited the area with their grandchildren, voiced discomfort about the potential risks associated with the crisis center's proximity to the school and Cramer Field, a popular site for youth sports. The resident highlighted existing community challenges, including a recent murder near a nearby grocery store, and questioned the safety of children walking to and from school buses in the vicinity.

Concerns were raised about the possibility of drug-related activities and other disturbances, prompting inquiries about the center's policies on smoking, littering, and drug use on the property. A representative from the Oregon Health Authority assured attendees that the facility would be smoke-free and drug-free, with staff present 24/7 to provide supervision and support.

Despite these assurances, residents remained skeptical about the effectiveness of the proposed measures in ensuring safety for children and families in the neighborhood. One resident challenged the representative to consider whether they would feel comfortable living across the street from the facility, particularly with young children or elderly family members.

The discussion also touched on the broader context of community safety, with some arguing that the challenges posed by the crisis center were already present in the area. Proponents of the facility emphasized the importance of structured support for individuals in need, suggesting that the center could help mitigate existing issues by providing supervision and resources.

As the meeting concluded, the debate highlighted the complex balance between community needs for mental health resources and the safety concerns of local residents, leaving many questions unanswered about the future of the proposed crisis center.