A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Activists demand change to F-35 mission for community safety

August 12, 2024 | Burlington City, Chittenden County, Vermont


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Activists demand change to F-35 mission for community safety
In a recent city council meeting, community members voiced strong concerns regarding the ongoing F-35 military mission at Burlington International Airport, urging council members to support a resolution aimed at changing the aircraft's mission. The discussions highlighted the significant noise pollution caused by the F-35s, which many residents argue negatively impacts the health and well-being of children and pets in the surrounding areas.

Several speakers emphasized the detrimental effects of the F-35 noise, which can reach levels of 115 decibels. Ashley Adams, a resident of Ward 6, pointed out that decades of research link extreme noise exposure to various health issues, including developmental delays in children and increased rates of depression. She called the F-35 basing a \"stain upon this community\" and labeled it a case study in environmental injustice.

Sal Melicamp, another resident, noted the financial burden on the city, estimating that Burlington International Airport would require $5.5 million annually for the next 46 years to soundproof homes, a solution that would not address outdoor noise exposure. He urged the council to consider the long-term implications of maintaining the F-35 mission.

Lucy Gluck, who works in the area, described the anxiety and disruption caused by the jets, particularly for children and those from war-torn backgrounds. She advocated for a shift to a transport mission, which could potentially create more jobs and reduce noise levels.

The resolution, which aims to prompt federal representatives to request a change in the F-35 mission, received widespread support from attendees. Many speakers framed the issue as not just a local concern but a moral imperative, questioning whether the government should be causing harm to its citizens, particularly vulnerable populations like children.

As the council prepares to vote on the resolution, the community remains hopeful that their voices will lead to a significant change in the military operations affecting their daily lives.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee