In a recent government meeting, residents of Waterford expressed deep concerns regarding the Bell development site on Hudson Drive, particularly its environmental and health implications. Over 100 community members attended the planning meeting, voicing their opposition to the site, which has been linked to potential contamination of local wetlands and air quality issues due to cement crushing operations.

One resident highlighted the developer's history of non-compliance, questioning the rationale behind granting approval to a business that has previously violated regulations. The speaker emphasized the importance of protecting the community's wellhead and wetlands, which are vital resources for Waterford. They argued that allowing industrial operations near these sensitive areas poses a significant risk to both the environment and public health.

Concerns were raised about the lack of transparency in the approval process, particularly regarding the conditions set for the development, such as the planting of trees and the construction of a retention pond, which have reportedly not been fulfilled. Residents demanded accountability and monitoring of the site, especially regarding silica dust emissions, which can have severe health consequences, including respiratory diseases.

Mary Crate, another resident and educator, echoed these sentiments, questioning the adequacy of the performance bond in place and the enforcement of operational limits, such as restrictions on cement crushing during high winds. She called for a town hall meeting to address these pressing issues and ensure that community voices are heard in the decision-making process.

The meeting underscored a growing frustration among residents who feel that their concerns are being overlooked in favor of business interests. As the community grapples with the implications of the Bell development, the call for greater oversight and a commitment to environmental safety remains a central theme in ongoing discussions.