In a recent planning board meeting, the proposed major amendment to the Banyan K design guidelines and development regulations sparked significant discussion and concern among board members and community representatives. Senior planner Kevy DeFranc presented staff's findings, recommending approval of the amendment, which would allow modifications to existing signage at the Banyan Cay Resort and Golf Club.

DeFranc clarified that the proposed changes would not restrict the content of permanent identification signs, allowing for potential updates to the signage. However, he emphasized that any removal of the Banyan K name from the signs would necessitate a minor amendment and a separate review process.

Community representatives, including Steven Joseph and David Bradley, voiced strong objections regarding the potential for a name change and the adequacy of public notice about the meeting. Joseph expressed concerns that the proposed changes could undermine the identity of the residences at Banyan Cay, which have been established since 2018. He urged that the Banyan K name be retained on signage and that all entities within the community receive equal representation.

Bradley raised issues about the notification process, stating that many residents did not receive adequate notice of the meeting, which he argued could lead to misunderstandings about the nature of the proposed changes. He requested that the board table the discussion until proper notice could be ensured.

The board deliberated on the notice deficiencies, with members expressing discomfort in proceeding without confirming that all affected residents had been adequately informed. Ultimately, the board voted unanimously to continue the discussion to the next meeting, scheduled for September 7, allowing time for proper notifications to be sent out and for community concerns to be addressed.

The outcome of this meeting highlights the importance of community engagement in planning processes and the need for clear communication regarding changes that could impact local identities. The planning board's decision to delay reflects a commitment to ensuring that all voices are heard before moving forward with significant amendments to community guidelines.