During a recent government meeting, resident Tim Bradley voiced strong opposition to a proposed special assessment for road work on Wimbledon Drive, which could result in a bill of up to $35,000 for homeowners. Bradley, an attorney and father of three, emphasized the financial burden this assessment would impose on families, particularly in light of rising costs associated with road improvements.

Bradley argued that the rationale for the special assessment—claiming unique benefits to residents—does not hold true for Wimbledon Drive, which serves as a major thoroughfare in Birmingham. He highlighted the heavy traffic on the road, including school buses and emergency vehicles, and noted that the street is frequently used as a connector route for neighboring areas. He pointed out that the multimodal transportation board recognizes the road's significance, contradicting the notion that residents should bear the financial burden of its maintenance.

The proposed funding split of 85% for residents and 15% for the city was also criticized by Bradley, who compared it to the more equitable 50/50 splits seen in nearby communities like Royal Oak and Troy. He argued that the costs imposed on residents must be proportional to the benefits received, stating that paving the road would not significantly increase property values.

Bradley further expressed concern over the rapid increase in paving costs, which have reportedly doubled since 2016, and noted that the special assessment method is unpopular among residents, with over 95% of those surveyed on his street opposing the funding approach.

The meeting highlighted ongoing discussions about road funding and the implications for residents, as the city considers how to balance infrastructure needs with community concerns.