Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

City Council to decide fate of major housing development

July 12, 2024 | Bakersfield, Kern County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

City Council to decide fate of major housing development
In a recent public hearing, the Bakersfield City Council discussed the vesting tentative tract map 7356, which proposes the subdivision of 63.5 acres in Southwest Bakersfield into 218 single-family lots, four public park lots, one drill site, and one drainage basin. The project, located in the West Meng specific plan, village A, also known as Highgate at 7 Oaks, was initially approved by the planning commission on May 2, 2024.

During the meeting, Planning Director Paul Johnson presented the details of the project, noting that the planning commission had received an appeal from the Friends of the Bakersfield Kit Fox and Environment shortly after their approval. This appeal, submitted on May 10, referenced concerns outlined in a letter sent to the commission prior to their decision.

Despite the appeal, Johnson indicated that the property owner had adequately addressed the concerns raised, and city staff recommended that the council deny the appeal and uphold the planning commission's approval of the tract map. The council now faces a decision between two options: to deny the appeal and approve the map, or to approve the appeal, which would overturn the planning commission's decision.

The council's decision on this matter will have significant implications for the development of the area and the management of local environmental concerns.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal