Residents of Lavelle Road expressed significant concerns during a recent government meeting regarding a proposed subdivision that could impact their community. The discussions highlighted issues related to traffic safety, road conditions, and environmental considerations.

Ken, a resident whose property borders the proposed development, voiced his alarm over the unexpected sale of the land to an out-of-state buyer. He raised concerns about the proximity of new homes to his property, particularly due to his daughter's health issues. He emphasized the need for careful consideration of the subdivision's implications on existing residents.

Terry Eiler, another long-time resident, echoed these sentiments, stressing the narrowness of Lavelle Road and its inadequate drainage system. He pointed out that the road's current infrastructure could not support additional housing units, raising fears about potential water and septic system failures. Eiler also expressed skepticism about the viability of temporary rentals, suggesting that single-family homes would be a more suitable development.

Stevie Waddell, who has lived on Lavelle Road for 57 years, highlighted the increase in traffic over the decades, noting that the road has remained unchanged despite the growing number of residents. She warned that the road's narrowness and blind spots pose serious safety risks, especially with the influx of visitors to existing Airbnbs in the area.

Bob Stoll added to the safety concerns, describing the road as dangerous for both residents and pedestrians. He noted that the lack of sidewalks forces people to walk on the road, increasing the risk of accidents.

The meeting also touched on the potential need for road improvements and utility upgrades, with some residents suggesting that annexation might be necessary to facilitate these changes. The board clarified that their focus was primarily on the lot splits and that broader land use issues fell outside their jurisdiction.

As the community grapples with these concerns, the board plans to revisit the matter in a subsequent meeting, allowing residents to voice their opinions and seek solutions to the challenges posed by the proposed subdivision.