In a recent government meeting, officials discussed potential updates to municipal codes and design guidelines, particularly in light of the increasing size and number of new buildings in the area. The conversation highlighted significant changes made since 2016, including the elimination of maximum building size restrictions and the introduction of high-density zoning, which have contributed to a surge in larger construction projects.

Officials noted that since the removal of the maximum building size limits, approximately ten buildings in the 35,000 to 50,000 square foot range have been constructed, with five more approved and three under discussion. The changes were primarily aimed at addressing the need for workforce housing, which had been stymied by previous zoning regulations that required developers to navigate a cumbersome Planned Unit Development (PUD) process.

The meeting also addressed the implications of a \"2 for 1 workforce bonus\" initiative, which allows developers to exceed floor area ratio limits when creating workforce housing. This policy has led to larger projects, as developers can build more units without the constraints previously imposed by zoning laws. Additionally, height restrictions have been adjusted, allowing buildings to rise from 35 feet to as much as 48 feet in certain zones.

Concerns were raised about the aesthetic and functional implications of these changes, particularly regarding the concept of \"street walls\"—a design element that encourages buildings to be constructed close together to create a cohesive urban environment. Officials acknowledged that while the design guidelines provide a framework for development, they are not regulations and may not adequately control the visual impact of new buildings.

Parking standards have also been revised, reducing requirements to facilitate more housing development on limited site areas. The meeting concluded with a recognition of the need for ongoing discussions about balancing growth with community character and design quality, emphasizing that while regulations can guide development, the nuances of good design often require a more flexible approach.