During a recent government meeting, discussions centered around a proposed charter referendum that has sparked significant public debate. One commissioner expressed support for the referendum but acknowledged the need for taxpayer approval, emphasizing that the ultimate decision lies with the voters. The commissioner highlighted the importance of having emergency authority, citing lost opportunities following Hurricane Ian as a catalyst for the proposed changes.

Public comments revealed strong opposition to the referendum. Stephanie Gibson, a local resident, shared the results of a flash poll conducted in a community Facebook group, which indicated that 83% of respondents opposed granting borrowing authority without voter approval. Gibson questioned the rationale behind amending the charter when there appears to be little public desire for such changes. She suggested that instead of relinquishing voter rights, the city should focus on ensuring that all projects requiring borrowing are presented to voters through referendums.

Another resident, Willie Braswell, echoed these sentiments, advocating for the preservation of the current city charter. He expressed concern over the potential financial implications of the referendum, arguing that taxpayers would prefer to invest in necessary projects rather than risk large sums on uncertain future expenditures.

The meeting underscored a clear divide between city officials and residents regarding the proposed charter changes, with many citizens advocating for maintaining voter control over borrowing decisions. As the discussion continues, the city faces the challenge of addressing public concerns while navigating the complexities of governance and emergency preparedness.