During a recent government meeting, significant discussions emerged regarding the negotiation process with the union and the handling of pension plan decisions. A board member expressed frustration over receiving misinformation from the previous board administrator, particularly concerning the necessity of negotiating with the union. Contrary to earlier beliefs, it was revealed that the board could waive bargaining, a point that had been contested.

The member referenced a letter from Dave Carroll, which provided clarity on the situation. In a previous meeting held in March, a presentation was made to the pension board attorney, who subsequently confirmed that the board was included in the share plan and should be updated for annual crediting. This initial decision brought excitement among board members; however, their optimism was short-lived. Shortly after, the board attorney issued a reversal of that decision, leading to disappointment among the members.

This exchange highlights ongoing challenges within the board's governance and the complexities of pension negotiations, raising questions about communication and decision-making processes moving forward.