Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Lawmakers clash over climate change amendments in heated debate

June 26, 2024 | Rules: House Committee, Standing Committees - House & Senate, Congressional Hearings Compilation



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Lawmakers clash over climate change amendments in heated debate
During a recent government committee meeting, discussions centered around proposed amendments to HR 8771, particularly those aimed at addressing climate change. Representative Stansberry introduced a series of amendments—numbered 24 through 30—that sought to eliminate what she described as harmful anti-climate provisions in the Senate and foreign operations bill.

Stansberry emphasized the urgency of addressing climate change, citing recent extreme weather events as evidence of its impact on American communities and military bases. She referenced Deputy Defense Secretary Kathleen Hicks, who stated that nations best equipped to manage climate change would gain a strategic advantage. Stansberry argued that the U.S. must not ignore these challenges and should enhance its climate resilience efforts rather than diminish them.

Despite her passionate appeal for support, the committee ultimately voted against the amendments. A recorded vote was requested, revealing a clear division among committee members, with the majority opposing the proposed changes. The outcome reflects ongoing tensions in legislative approaches to climate policy, highlighting the challenges faced in advancing climate initiatives within the current political landscape.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting