In a contentious first meeting, the newly elected city council faced criticism regarding its commitment to free speech and transparency. A public commenter expressed concerns about the council's decision to limit public comment to a single session at the end of meetings, arguing that this change undermines citizens' rights to voice their opinions. The commenter recalled previous remarks made by council members about the past administration, suggesting a pattern of dismissing public concerns.

The council defended its actions, asserting that it has not compromised anyone's rights and remains committed to transparency. However, the public's skepticism was evident, particularly regarding a recent decision to alter a proclamation related to Patriot Month, which was criticized for being made without adequate public discussion.

The commenter emphasized the importance of the First Amendment and accused the council of acting like \"kings and queens\" rather than public servants. This meeting marks a significant moment for the council as it navigates the balance between governance and public engagement, with community members closely watching its actions moving forward.