In a recent government meeting, Gurney officials discussed the proposed establishment of a fixed-site emergency shelter, sparking a heated debate over its potential impact on the community. The proposal, which aims to provide temporary housing for the unhoused, was met with mixed reactions from board members and residents alike.

One board member emphasized that while the shelter could improve the health and safety of those seeking refuge, it may not benefit the existing residents of the east side of Gurney. Concerns were raised about the shelter's alignment with the 2020 Comprehensive Plan, which promotes the area as a gateway for small to medium retail services and mixed-use developments, rather than a permanent shelter. The member noted that the plan does not mention a fixed-site shelter and stressed the need for the east side to become a vibrant part of Gurney.

Another trustee voiced strong opposition to the shelter, citing feedback from residents and businesses who expressed their desire against the proposed location. They highlighted the potential for increased crime and safety issues, referencing personal experiences and concerns raised by local law enforcement. A letter from a Gurney resident, who previously worked as a police officer, detailed negative consequences observed in other communities with similar shelters, including increased disturbances and resource strain on local law enforcement.

The discussion underscored a broader concern about homelessness, mental health, and community safety, with some officials advocating for compassion and support for the unhoused population while simultaneously prioritizing the welfare of current residents. The meeting concluded without a definitive resolution, leaving the future of the proposed shelter uncertain as officials continue to weigh the community's needs against the challenges of homelessness.