In a recent government meeting, concerns were raised regarding the lease agreement between the National Park Service (NPS) and the city of New York for Floyd Bennett Field, a designated historic property. The lease, which allows for the establishment of a migrant camp, has sparked controversy due to the apparent bypassing of the typical Section 106 review process, which is designed to protect historic sites.

During the discussions, it was revealed that there was no consultation with historic preservation officers or local residents prior to the lease's signing. This lack of communication has raised alarms among community representatives, who argue that the NPS has sidestepped necessary public engagement and transparency. One representative emphasized the disrespect shown to the community, which comprises over 137,000 residents, by not informing them about the potential impacts of the migrant camp on the historic site.

Critics of the lease have expressed concern that the NPS accepted a promise of future improvements to the area in exchange for the lease, rather than ensuring immediate protections for the historic property. This has led to questions about whether such practices are becoming standard under the current administration, particularly in light of the ongoing national crisis regarding migration.

The meeting highlighted a broader issue of transparency and communication between federal agencies and local communities, with representatives calling for a more dignified approach to housing migrants. They urged the NPS to reconsider the lease renewal set for September, advocating for solutions that respect both the needs of migrants and the integrity of historic sites.