During a recent city council meeting, community members raised significant concerns regarding the management of Measure U funds and the effectiveness of animal control services.

One resident expressed frustration over the allocation of $100 million in Measure U funds, questioning the council's transparency and accountability. They emphasized that the city had promised voters increased public safety measures, yet the funds appeared to be mismanaged, with a focus on high-level management budgets rather than direct community benefits. The resident called for an audit of Measure U to ensure that the funds are being used appropriately and not as a \"slush fund.\"

Another speaker, Ed Clark, highlighted issues with the city's animal control services, recounting a personal experience where he struggled to receive assistance after finding an abandoned puppy. He suggested that the council consider postponing a vote on a contract related to animal services, citing inadequate response times and a lack of personnel available within city limits. Clark proposed that the contract should include stipulations for timely responses and accountability measures for service failures.

Carolyn Traskolski shared a similar story, detailing a chaotic incident involving two dogs in her hardware store. She criticized the city's animal control for their slow response and lack of availability, particularly on weekends. Traskolski stressed the need for reliable animal control services to ensure public safety and protect community members from dangerous situations.

The discussions underscored a growing demand for improved transparency in budget management and enhanced animal control services, reflecting community members' desire for accountability from their elected officials.