During a recent board meeting for the Adelanto Elementary School District, significant concerns were raised regarding transparency and decision-making processes, particularly surrounding the hiring of an interim superintendent of Human Resources. Several speakers, including representatives from the California School Employees Association (CSEA) and the Adelanto District Teachers Association (ADTA), expressed frustration over the lack of involvement in the hiring process, which they claimed was conducted without proper search protocols or interviews.
One speaker criticized the board for making substantial decisions during the summer when many teachers are unavailable, suggesting that this timing was intentional to avoid scrutiny. The speaker emphasized the need for higher standards in hiring practices, arguing that appointing someone from outside the district without a thorough vetting process undermines the integrity of the district.
Jason Turgers, a labor relations representative from CSEA, highlighted ongoing negotiations regarding pay and benefits for classified employees, pointing out a proposed budget increase of $255,000 for conferences and travel. He argued that this amount could instead provide a raise for classified staff, who are already facing financial challenges due to rising health and welfare costs. Turgers condemned the district's decision to deduct next year's health insurance costs from current paychecks, a practice he claimed was unprecedented and lacked transparency.
Diane Lynn, another speaker, raised alarms about the district's financial management, specifically referencing a $9 million repayment to the state due to mismanagement of funds. She questioned the board's commitment to educational priorities, such as purchasing necessary materials for students, and criticized the lack of accountability regarding budgetary practices.
The meeting concluded with a call for the board to reconsider its priorities and improve its relationship with staff, emphasizing the need for transparency and collaboration in decision-making processes. The board moved to a closed session following the public comments, leaving many concerns unresolved.