A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Council debates contentious subdivision appeal amid community backlash

August 20, 2024 | Memphis City, Shelby County, Tennessee


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council debates contentious subdivision appeal amid community backlash
In a recent government meeting, a contentious appeal regarding a proposed subdivision in the Coral Lake neighborhood was discussed, highlighting ongoing tensions between developers and local residents. The appeal, initiated by Dr. Sherry Jeffreys Compton and Brendan Milk Cohen, sought to overturn a decision made by the Land Use Control Board (LUCB) that had previously approved modifications to the subdivision plan.

Chloe Christian from the Department of Planning and Development (DPD) presented the case, which involved a request for a time extension, a phasing plan, and the introduction of private streets for the subdivision at 1506 True Road. While the DPD supported the time extension and phasing plan, it opposed the request for private streets, citing concerns over connectivity and compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC).

Gerald Robinson, the applicant, was present but chose not to make a statement before questions arose. Councilman Ford expressed strong opposition to the development, criticizing Robinson for a perceived lack of cooperation with the community and for proposing smaller homes that he described as \"matchboxes.\" Ford emphasized the need for developments that align with the existing neighborhood character, which features larger, more expensive homes.

The discussion revealed deep-seated frustrations among council members and residents regarding the frequency of similar proposals in the area. Councilman Walker echoed these sentiments, questioning the rationale behind the request for private streets when public connectivity was deemed necessary.

Ultimately, the council decided to hold the item for 30 days to allow for further community discussions, indicating a desire for more engagement with local residents before moving forward with the subdivision plans. This decision reflects ongoing concerns about development practices in the district and the importance of community input in shaping local neighborhoods.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Tennessee articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI