In a heated exchange during a recent government meeting in Marseilles, a citizen voiced strong opposition to a controversial rule that restricts public discourse about city officials. The individual criticized the mayor for allegedly threatening legal action against residents who express dissenting opinions online, claiming such actions reflect poorly on the city.

The citizen highlighted a specific incident where the mayor purportedly indicated he would take legal steps against those who criticized him, stating, \"People are entitled to their own opinion.\" This sentiment was echoed throughout the meeting, as the speaker emphasized the importance of accountability for public officials and the right of citizens to voice their concerns without fear of retribution.

The discussion escalated as the citizen referenced a deleted social media post from the mayor, which allegedly contained threats of lawsuits for slander against critics. The speaker urged the mayor to follow through with his threats, asserting that the community deserves transparency and accountability from its leaders.

The meeting concluded with the citizen's remarks, which underscored a growing tension between city officials and residents regarding freedom of speech and the responsibilities of elected leaders. As the session moved on to other business, the implications of this confrontation lingered, raising questions about the future of public discourse in Marseilles.