During a recent city council meeting, a proposal to increase the speed limit on Waldo Boulevard from 25 miles per hour to 30 miles per hour was met with significant debate. The request, documented as item 1665, was initially recommended for denial by the public safety committee. However, Alderman Rekleberg proposed an amendment to change the speed limit to 30 mph, arguing that the current limit is unreasonable given the traffic patterns and the road's characteristics.
Rekleberg highlighted that the proposed change would only require the replacement of three existing speed limit signs, resulting in minimal costs. He noted that many residents had expressed their support for a higher limit on social media, with some even suggesting speeds of 35 to 45 mph. He emphasized that setting the limit at 30 mph could encourage compliance among drivers, who often exceed the current limit.
Opposition to the amendment came from several council members, including Alderman Bolt, who argued that raising the speed limit could pose safety risks, particularly for pedestrians and children in the area. Bolt pointed out that the road serves as a residential area with numerous driveways, which could lead to dangerous situations if drivers exceed the limit.
Alderman Schley echoed concerns about consistency in speed limits throughout the city, suggesting that a comprehensive review of speed limits might be necessary. He noted discrepancies in speed limits on different sections of Waldo Boulevard and other roads, questioning the rationale behind the proposed changes.
Alderman Cummings, who initially supported a higher limit, ultimately sided with constituents who opposed the change, citing safety concerns raised during public meetings. He suggested that a study on speed limits across the city could provide a more informed basis for future decisions.
The council ultimately decided to maintain the current speed limit of 25 mph, reflecting the concerns of residents and the need for further discussion on speed regulations in the city. The debate highlighted the complexities of balancing traffic flow with community safety, underscoring the importance of public input in local governance.