Residents of Daytona Beach expressed strong concerns during a recent city commission meeting regarding a proposed senior housing development in their neighborhood. The discussions highlighted fears about flooding, increased property taxes, and the potential overshadowing of homes by the new construction.

Patricia Williams, a long-time resident of Cardinal Estates, voiced her opposition to the project, citing worries about the size of the building and its impact on the community. She questioned whether the development would benefit current residents or serve the financial interests of developers. Williams also raised concerns about possible increases in water bills and property taxes, suggesting that the decision to proceed with the project may have already been made without adequate community input.

Frederick Brown echoed these sentiments, criticizing the notification process for the project, which he deemed improper due to missing information. He urged the commission to delay the decision to allow for further discussion with residents, emphasizing the area's history of flooding and the need for responsible development.

In contrast, some speakers supported the project, arguing that it would address the community's need for senior housing. Jim Cameron highlighted the importance of such developments for working-class families, while John Nicholson defended the project by explaining that the proposed building would be situated far enough away from existing homes to minimize visual and environmental impacts.

The meeting underscored a divide among residents, with some advocating for the development as a necessary addition to the community, while others remained steadfast in their opposition, fearing negative consequences for their neighborhood. The city commission is now faced with the challenge of balancing these conflicting perspectives as they consider the future of the proposed senior housing project.