In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the implications of the Design Review Committee (DRC) requirements on affordable housing developments. The DRC is mandated for certain projects, but local governments cannot impose permanent permit approval requirements if the development includes affordable units for families or individuals earning below 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI). This provision raises questions about the interpretation of \"units,\" as it does not specify a minimum number, leading to potential ambiguity in its application.

A review of state law from 2021 highlighted that the DRC's role may extend beyond what is required by state statutes, potentially adding significant review time—between 60 to 120 days—and additional costs, known as \"soft costs,\" to developers. These costs could ultimately impact the affordability of housing, as they may be passed on to tenants.

Commissioners expressed concerns that the lengthy review process could deter developers from committing to deeper affordability levels. The meeting underscored the importance of balancing design review processes with the need to streamline approvals for affordable housing projects. Legal and planning staff were called upon to clarify the relationship between mandatory reviews and voluntary compliance with state statutes, emphasizing that while design guidelines are not mandatory, they remain a consideration in the planning process.

Overall, the discussions highlighted the ongoing challenge of ensuring that design requirements do not hinder the delivery of affordable housing, a critical issue as communities strive to meet growing housing demands.