Confusion over police de escalation training sparks debate

During a recent Boulder Police Oversight Panel meeting, members engaged in a critical discussion regarding the recent de-escalation training conducted on July 13. Panelists expressed concerns about the differing interpretations of \"de-escalation\" between police practices and public understanding. One member highlighted that the training focused more on the use of force and equipment, such as handcuffs and tactical gear, rather than the verbal techniques typically associated with de-escalation in community contexts.

Elaine, a panel member, articulated her surprise at the emphasis on police equipment during a session intended to address de-escalation, suggesting that the public may have a different expectation of what de-escalation entails. Another member echoed this sentiment, noting that the training felt more informative about police force than about de-escalation strategies. This led to a broader conversation about the need for clearer communication and training that distinguishes between the two concepts.

Terry, another panelist, clarified that the training was designed to cover both use of force and defensive tactics, and the presentation of equipment was a specific request to enhance understanding. However, several members advocated for a separate, focused training on de-escalation tactics to better align police practices with community expectations.

The meeting also included updates on case reviews, with the panel noting that they are actively reviewing multiple cases and awaiting the police department's disposition on one case. The panel is working to ensure thorough oversight and accountability within the police department, emphasizing the importance of understanding both police practices and community perceptions.