During a recent city council meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the proposed changes to the city’s governance structure, particularly the move towards a nine-member city council. Speakers expressed frustration over the rushed decision-making process, which they believe undermines the thoughtful contributions of committee members and the community.

One speaker criticized the council for altering its direction mid-meeting, suggesting that the abrupt shift towards a ballot initiative for a nine-member council lacked transparency and proper communication. They argued that this change could lead to a concentration of power in specific areas of the city, potentially disenfranchising residents who do not share the same vision as the majority.

Another speaker echoed these sentiments, highlighting a perceived lack of public support for expanding the council. They pointed out that there has been no significant citizen petition or demand for additional council members, questioning the rationale behind the proposed increase. Instead, they urged the council to focus on improving communication and local engagement rather than expanding governance.

Both speakers called for a reconsideration of the ballot proposal, advocating for a return to the original plan that had been collaboratively developed by the wards advisory committee. They emphasized the importance of maintaining geographic balance and equity within the city’s governance structure, warning that the current trajectory could lead to a backlash from constituents.

The discussions reflect a broader concern about governance practices in Westminster, with calls for more inclusive and transparent decision-making processes as the city approaches the 2024 ballot.