Residents of Pierce County expressed significant concerns during a recent government meeting regarding a proposed ordinance that would allow the county to initiate condemnation proceedings on private properties for a road expansion project. The discussions highlighted the impact on homeowners, particularly those whose properties would be temporarily affected by construction activities.

Ashley Denton, a local resident, voiced her apprehension about the project, noting that the proposed use of her land for construction would encroach 3 to 4 feet into her property. She questioned the financial rationale behind the project, suggesting that existing county land could be utilized instead of infringing on private property. Denton emphasized the emotional toll this would take on her family and the potential financial burden on taxpayers.

David Waller, another affected neighbor, echoed these sentiments, expressing frustration over the lack of clear communication from county representatives. He described the disruption caused by the project, including plans to replace their newly installed fence with a temporary structure for up to seven years. Waller and his neighbors are concerned about the long-term implications of the project on their properties and quality of life.

Robert Noble, Waller's spouse, added that communication from county officials has been inconsistent, complicating their ability to negotiate effectively. He highlighted the need for transparency and timely updates regarding the project’s progress and its impact on their homes.

Public comments also raised environmental concerns, particularly regarding stormwater management associated with the construction. Roxy Giddings questioned how the county plans to handle runoff from the newly paved areas, urging officials to consider the ecological implications of their decisions.

Transportation Improvement Manager Leticia Neal addressed the council, clarifying that the condemnation ordinance is a procedural step that does not guarantee immediate action. She assured residents that the county aims to negotiate amicably with property owners and that the ordinance serves as a tool to facilitate negotiations if necessary.

Neal explained that the project is expected to begin construction in the spring of next year, although potential funding opportunities could delay the timeline. She acknowledged the challenges of balancing project needs with the rights and concerns of property owners, promising to improve communication and address the issues raised by residents.

The council is set to deliberate on the ordinance, with members emphasizing the importance of finding a resolution that respects the needs of the community while advancing necessary infrastructure improvements.