During a recent government meeting, concerns were raised regarding safety regulations in national forests, particularly in relation to hunting and law enforcement. Several attendees expressed disappointment over the perceived inadequacy of safety measures, especially following the removal of the U.S. Forest Service from certain regulatory discussions.

One speaker highlighted the need for consistent safety protections akin to those in Wildlife Management Areas (WMAs), emphasizing that the current enforcement structure—where only federal officers can enforce rules—creates confusion and safety risks. The speaker argued that increasing the number of state law enforcement officers involved could enhance safety for those using the forest for recreation, including hunting.

Another participant echoed these sentiments, advocating for specific rules such as prohibiting hunting within 100 feet of public roads to ensure safety for property owners adjacent to national forests. The call for clearer regulations was underscored by concerns about the lack of enforcement and the potential dangers posed by hunters in close proximity to residential areas.

Additionally, discussions touched on broader hunting regulations, including the elimination of dog hunting days and restrictions on hunting methods, which some argued limit opportunities for youth engagement in hunting activities. The prohibition of certain hunting practices, such as the use of buckshot in WMAs, was also criticized for potentially hindering novice hunters.

Senator Seymour raised constitutional concerns regarding the imposition of stringent gun control laws by the Forest Service and the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks. He argued that such regulations infringe upon the rights of citizens under both state and federal constitutions, calling for a reevaluation of the proposed changes to ensure they align with constitutional protections.

The meeting concluded with a commitment from officials to consider the feedback provided by the public, particularly regarding the need for improved safety measures and clearer regulations in national forests. The discussions reflect ongoing tensions between regulatory enforcement, public safety, and the rights of hunters and landowners in Mississippi.