During a recent government meeting, community members expressed growing concerns over the city’s financial management and the potential for a tax increase. The discussions highlighted a perceived lack of transparency regarding the allocation of funds, particularly those diverted from the general fund.

One speaker emphasized that taxpayers are becoming increasingly frustrated with the financial situation, suggesting that any proposed tax increase would require the city to be forthright about past financial decisions. The speaker warned that failure to address these concerns could lead to significant pushback from the community.

Another participant, Chuck Harbor, acknowledged the savvy nature of local taxpayers, noting that they are currently benefiting from a 3% savings due to a previous initiative. He argued that a modest increase in the sales tax on non-food items could be justified, especially given Loveland's relatively low tax rate compared to other cities. Harbor criticized the lack of debate on the proposed tax increase, which he believed could be packaged in a way that would gain public support.

Cindy Van Slanbrook, another attendee, raised questions about the city’s budgeting process, calling for a line-item budget to enhance transparency. She expressed concern over the commingling of funds and the lack of clear information regarding how taxpayer dollars are being utilized. Van Slanbrook insisted that citizens deserve access to detailed financial information, including the surpluses of enterprise funds and their intended uses.

The meeting underscored a critical moment for local governance, as officials face pressure to improve transparency and accountability while navigating potential tax increases to address budgetary shortfalls.