Eaton County officials convened to discuss the pressing needs of the county's technology services and parks departments, highlighting significant budgetary requests and staffing challenges.

The technology services department is seeking $2.6 million for the 2024-2025 fiscal year, with $1.9 million requested from the general fund. The department, currently operating with ten staff members due to two vacancies, provides critical support for county operations, including cybersecurity, data storage, and disaster recovery. The department's director emphasized the importance of maintaining a secure network, especially as technology demands grow and the county faces unfunded mandates from state and federal levels. The estimated capital improvement expenses for technology infrastructure over the next six years are projected to reach $11.8 million, underscoring the need for ongoing investment in technology to ensure efficient operations.

Staffing shortages have been a persistent issue, with the director noting that competitive wages and the shift to remote work opportunities have made recruitment challenging. The department has historically served as a training ground for employees who often leave for better-paying positions elsewhere. This turnover has strained the remaining staff, impacting their ability to manage day-to-day operations effectively.

In parallel, the parks department reported on its ongoing efforts to address infrastructure needs following a voter-approved millage aimed at improving facilities. Currently managed by interim leadership, the department operates with six full-time staff and 13 seasonal workers, which limits its capacity to expand programming and manage projects effectively. Deferred maintenance has left many parks struggling with outdated infrastructure, and while the millage funding will help address safety improvements, the rebuilding process is expected to be gradual.

Both departments highlighted the critical need for increased funding and staffing to meet the growing demands of their services, emphasizing that decisions made at the local level have far-reaching implications for operations and costs. The discussions reflect a broader challenge faced by local governments in balancing budget constraints with the need for essential services and infrastructure improvements.