In a recent city council meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding a proposed warehouse project in Redlands, following a public hearing that attracted 33 written comments—28 opposing the project and only 5 in support. Public commenters voiced their apprehensions about the environmental impact, particularly the lack of a full Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a project of this magnitude.
Council members echoed these concerns, with one member emphasizing the need for thorough data analysis, citing alarming statistics about air quality and health risks in the Inland Empire. The region has been identified as having the highest concentrations of ozone in the country, with diesel exhaust contributing to 70% of cancer risk from air pollution. The council member, who represents District 1, highlighted personal worries about the health implications for families, particularly children, living near existing warehouses.
Another council member acknowledged the planning commission's unanimous recommendation to deny the project, citing traffic, air pollution, and public health as primary concerns. They stressed the importance of considering the community's health over potential short-term economic benefits, stating that the project would likely exacerbate existing environmental issues.
Despite the overwhelming public opposition, some council members argued in favor of the project, citing legal obligations and the need to support local unions. They contended that the project would comply with existing regulations and could provide job opportunities, although concerns about automation replacing these jobs were also raised.
The meeting underscored a deep divide among council members regarding the balance between economic development and public health, with many residents urging the council to prioritize community well-being over industrial expansion. As discussions continue, the future of the proposed warehouse remains uncertain, reflecting broader tensions in urban planning and environmental justice in the region.