During a recent city council meeting, concerns were raised regarding the Request for Proposals (RFP) for traffic calming measures, which was advertised on May 30th. A resident expressed dissatisfaction with the current requirement for designers to propose a minimum of two traffic calming measures, questioning the adequacy of this approach given the severity of speeding issues in the neighborhood.

The resident highlighted the ambiguity surrounding what constitutes a traffic calming measure, asking whether simple signage would qualify. They argued that the city should explore more comprehensive solutions, suggesting that the number of required measures should be increased to at least ten. This proposal aims to ensure that residents, who experience the dangers of speeding firsthand, have a significant voice in the decision-making process rather than relying solely on engineers who may not fully understand the local context.

The resident emphasized the urgency of addressing these concerns, particularly in light of upcoming housing construction projects in the area, which could exacerbate traffic issues. They urged the council to take proactive measures to prevent potential accidents, questioning whether it would take a serious incident for the city to act decisively.

The meeting underscored the importance of public involvement in urban planning and the need for a more robust approach to traffic safety in the community.