During a recent city council meeting, discussions centered on proposed amendments to the Pasadena City Charter, specifically regarding term limits for elected officials. The council deliberated on the recommendation from the charter study task force, which has been under review for several months.

Key points of contention arose around the language defining term limits. Some council members expressed concern over potential last-minute changes to the task force's recommendations, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the original proposal that limits officials to no more than three consecutive terms in office. The discussion highlighted the complexity of the term limit structure, with some members questioning whether a council member could serve one term, leave, and then return for three consecutive terms after a hiatus.

Public comments reflected strong community engagement, with speakers advocating for the resolution as it stands. Sonia Berndt, a community member, criticized attempts to alter the proposal at the last minute, arguing that it undermines the extensive work of the task force and disrespects community input. She voiced support for the amendments to establish term limits and called for the timely return of a proposed ordinance on campaign contribution limits.

The council ultimately decided to maintain the language as proposed by the city clerk, with minor adjustments, reinforcing the task force's intent and the importance of a clear and consistent approach to term limits. The council is expected to revisit the campaign contribution limits by September 6, as directed.