Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

New office proposal sparks debate over zoning variance

June 03, 2024 | Lebanon Board & Commissions, Lebanon, Grafton County, New Hampshire



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

New office proposal sparks debate over zoning variance
In a recent government meeting, the Lebanon Housing Authority presented plans to construct a new two-story office building on Romano Circle, citing significant growth in staff and the need for improved working conditions. The current office, which has served the authority for over 25 years, has become overcrowded, prompting the request for a variance to allow the new construction.

Megan Carrier, representing the authority, detailed the proposal, which includes seven office spaces, two interview rooms, and a conference room, among other facilities. The new building is intended to replace the existing office and will not increase the number of housing units, which is a key point in addressing zoning concerns.

The property currently houses two public housing projects and is zoned R2, which restricts certain developments. Carrier argued that the variance would not alter the character of the neighborhood or negatively impact public health and safety, as the new office would be an accessory use to the existing multifamily development. She emphasized that the construction would blend aesthetically with the surroundings and would be shielded from view by a natural tree buffer.

Board members raised questions regarding the justification for the variance, particularly focusing on the claim of hardship due to the size of the property. Some members expressed skepticism about whether the size alone constituted a unique condition warranting a variance. The discussion highlighted the need for legal clarification on whether the property’s dimensions could be considered a special condition under New Hampshire law.

The board decided to seek legal counsel on the matter before making a decision, indicating that further deliberation would be necessary to address the complexities of the variance request. The outcome of this meeting could significantly impact the future operations of the Lebanon Housing Authority and its ability to provide affordable housing in the community.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI