During a recent council meeting, a significant discussion emerged regarding salary increases for city officials, particularly in light of the city's affluence. One council member reiterated a long-standing principle against approving pay raises for elected officials during their terms, emphasizing that this stance is not politically motivated but rather based on personal conviction. This member has consistently voted against such raises for the past six years.

Another council member supported this viewpoint, highlighting the city's status as one of the more affluent municipalities in the state, suggesting that this financial standing should be reflected in the compensation of key city officials, including the chief of police and the mayor. The discussion pointed to the need for salaries to align with the city's economic status, advocating for compensation that places these officials within the top percentile of pay in the state.

Further contributions from council members noted the unique nature of the city's law enforcement structure, with a full-time chief operating in a part-time department, which complicates direct salary comparisons with other cities. The consensus among council members appeared to lean towards recognizing the city's wealth and the implications it has for fair compensation for its leaders. The meeting concluded without a definitive resolution on the proposed salary increases, leaving the discussion open for future deliberation.