In a recent village board meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding proposed amendments to conflict of interest policies and an anti-nepotism policy that some members argue could have discriminatory implications. A trustee, who is also an attorney, expressed strong opposition to the board's approach, asserting that existing Illinois law and local codes already address ethical concerns adequately.

The trustee highlighted that he has consistently disclosed any potential conflicts of interest and has sought legal counsel when necessary. He criticized the board for introducing new provisions that he believes exceed the authority of state law and could lead to legal challenges. He emphasized that the board's actions could harm reputations by forcing individuals to defend against subjective perceptions of bias.

A focal point of the discussion was the proposed anti-nepotism policy, which redefines \"immediate family\" to exclude spouses from serving on commissions while allowing other relatives to do so. The trustee argued that this change unfairly targets his wife, who has served on the Finance Commission, and suggested that it reflects a broader issue of discrimination based on marital status. He contended that the policy undermines the ability of married couples to express individual opinions and could be seen as a regressive step for the village.

The trustee called for transparency and accountability, urging any board member or staff who believes he has acted unethically to come forward with evidence. He concluded by asserting that the proposed measures could stifle volunteerism and diminish the contributions of qualified individuals to the community. The meeting underscored the ongoing debate over ethics and governance within the village, with implications for how local policies are shaped and enforced.