During a recent government meeting, community members voiced strong support for Bill 140, which aims to increase the operational days of transfer stations in Hawaii County, particularly the Kalapana transfer station. Testifiers highlighted the negative impact of reduced service, which has been limited to one day a week since 2020. Residents expressed frustration over the resulting off-site dumping and the confusion caused by the inconsistent waste management services across various locations.

The president of the Black Sands Property Owners Association emphasized that many residents in the Red Road and Opikau regions struggle to access alternative waste disposal facilities, leading to an increase in litter and hazardous materials improperly disposed of in the environment. He urged for more frequent and consistent waste collection services, suggesting that a dedicated location for hazardous materials be established at least once a month to prevent these items from ending up in landfills.

Kevin Bushell, representing the Seaview Subdivision, echoed these sentiments, advocating for a minimum of three operational days for waste collection to alleviate the burden on residents. He raised concerns about the lack of recycling options at local transfer stations, which he believes contributes to the improper disposal of recyclable materials.

In contrast, discussions surrounding Bill 169, which seeks a ten-year extension for the development of Royal Vistas, revealed significant community opposition. Testifiers, including Jerome Kanuha and Noelle Lindeman, raised concerns about the potential destruction of cultural resources and habitats, as well as the strain on local infrastructure. Lindeman pointed out that the Cultural Resources Commission and the Leeward Planning Commission have both expressed disapproval of the project, urging decision-makers to heed the community's concerns.

Corey Harden further criticized the development, questioning the long-term commitments of developers to affordable housing and the potential environmental consequences of the project. He called for skepticism regarding developers' promises and urged the council to prioritize preserving the land for future generations.

The meeting underscored the community's desire for improved waste management services and a cautious approach to development that respects cultural and environmental integrity.