During a recent government meeting, community members voiced strong concerns regarding two proposed bills, 104 and 169, highlighting issues related to land use, environmental protection, and infrastructure in the Colocco subdivision area.

Supporters of Bill 104 emphasized the need for equitable service to all citizens, while discussions around Bill 166 focused on the preservation of the native forest in Colocco. Testifiers expressed dismay over ongoing subdivisions that threaten the local ecosystem, arguing that the division of land into smaller parcels would lead to significant deforestation. They stressed the importance of maintaining the integrity of the forest, which they described as extraordinarily valuable.

Concerns were also raised about the safety of existing infrastructure, particularly the lack of a safe exit from the Colocco subdivision. Testifiers urged the county to address these safety issues before approving any further subdivisions.

Bill 169 drew significant criticism, with multiple speakers advocating for a \"no\" vote. They pointed out that the project, originally approved in 1984, requires a new Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) due to drastic changes in the area over the past four decades. Testifiers highlighted the need for a comprehensive review of infrastructure, citing increased traffic congestion and overtaxed water resources as critical issues. They questioned the adequacy of current sewage management and emergency services in light of proposed developments.

Moreover, concerns were raised about the developer's history of unfulfilled promises and the lack of community input in recent proposals. Testifiers called for transparency and urged the county to consider converting the flood-prone property into public open space rather than allowing further development.

Overall, the meeting underscored a community deeply invested in preserving their environment and ensuring that any development aligns with the needs and safety of residents.