In a recent government meeting, the Fresno County Board of Supervisors addressed two significant items under public health and public works, both involving the city of Hanford.

The board first approved a first amendment to an agreement with KWPH Enterprises, which is part of the standard agreements related to the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) regional communication dispatch center. This agreement aims to enhance the efficiency of EMS operations in the region. The motion passed with a 4-1 vote, with Supervisor Bridal recusing himself from the discussion.

Following this, the board authorized a retroactive revenue agreement with the city of Hanford, which involves reimbursement for EMS communication services. This agreement is also expected to streamline operations and improve service delivery in the area. Again, the motion was approved with a 4-1 vote, with one recusal.

The meeting then shifted focus to a public works item concerning an appeal of a mitigated negative declaration related to a trucking operation approved by the Planning Commission. The appeal was filed by Rebecca Vivinti, who raised concerns about the operation's compliance with zoning laws and its potential negative impact on the agricultural community. Vivinti argued that the trucking operation, which is located in an agricultural exclusive zone, does not exclusively haul agricultural products, thus violating zoning regulations.

During her presentation, Vivinti highlighted issues such as safety concerns, environmental impacts, and the potential for increased property taxes due to changes in land use. She emphasized the importance of maintaining agricultural integrity in the region and called for a more thorough environmental impact report.

In response, Donald Miranda, the owner of the trucking operation, defended his business, stating that the property had previously been used for similar purposes and that he had taken steps to improve the site and address community concerns.

The board is now tasked with deciding whether to uphold the Planning Commission's decision or to grant the appeal, which could lead to further environmental studies and potential changes to the operation's approval. The outcome of this appeal could have significant implications for land use and agricultural practices in Fresno County.