Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Father's drug test request raises questions over visitation rights

June 21, 2024 | Judicial, Tennessee



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Father's drug test request raises questions over visitation rights
In a recent court hearing, discussions centered around child support and visitation rights following a separation that began in December 2020. The father, identified as Mr. Eaves, testified that he provided approximately $1,000 in child support over 17 months, a figure that the mother did not contest. However, the mother expressed concerns regarding Mr. Eaves' drug use, which prompted a motion for a drug test to determine his eligibility for visitation.

The court was informed that Mr. Eaves had not requested any specific visitation arrangements during the motion for the drug test, which was primarily aimed at assessing his drug use. The mother had previously denied him overnight visitation, citing concerns about his potential substance abuse. Despite this, there were instances of sporadic visitation prior to May 2021, initiated by Mr. Eaves.

A guardian ad litem, Cassie White, participated in the proceedings and raised concerns during closing arguments about the appropriateness of terminating parental rights and proceeding with adoption, given the short duration of the marriage and the ongoing complexities of the case. She suggested that the situation might not be in the best interest of the child.

The court acknowledged that both parties have since entered into new relationships and are planning to pursue a divorce, indicating a significant shift in their circumstances. The discussions highlighted the ongoing challenges in navigating child support and visitation rights amid personal struggles and legal complexities.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Tennessee articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI