During a recent government meeting, community members voiced strong opposition to the censorship of books in local schools, particularly within the Advanced Placement (AP) curriculum. The discussions highlighted the importance of critical thinking and open dialogue in education, with several speakers emphasizing the role of literature in fostering empathy and understanding among students.

Carina, a parent and attorney, passionately defended the inclusion of challenging topics in school curricula, arguing that exposure to difficult subjects prepares students for college and life beyond. She expressed concern that banning books limits parents' ability to engage in meaningful discussions with their children, suggesting that such censorship mirrors historical precedents that should not be repeated.

Myra Moulton, a recent high school graduate now studying at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, echoed these sentiments. She shared her experiences in AP literature classes, asserting that they equipped her for advanced coursework and encouraged mature discussions. Moulton contrasted the censorship conversations she has with younger children at her summer camp with those in high school, advocating for the necessity of discussing complex themes in a responsible educational setting.

Katherine Ryan, the English department chair at Brookfield East High School, highlighted the effectiveness of student-led discussions in fostering critical thinking and respectful disagreement. She praised the students' ability to engage deeply with texts and each other, noting that these discussions prepare them for future challenges and encourage diverse perspectives.

The meeting underscored a collective call for maintaining access to diverse literature in schools, with community members advocating for an educational environment that promotes critical inquiry and empathy through reading.