In a recent government meeting, discussions centered on the future of energy projects in Colorado, particularly the proposed 150 megawatt wind project known as the 248-2. The Colorado Office of the Utility Consumer Advocate (UCA), along with Pueblo County and the City, have recommended the removal of this wind project from the company’s preferred portfolio, citing its high costs compared to available solar alternatives.

Staff members echoed these concerns, suggesting that substituting the wind project with a solar initiative could be more cost-effective, providing additional benefits to local communities and addressing a projected capacity shortfall in 2027. However, they acknowledged that this shift might lead to a slight increase in emissions.

In response, the company defended the wind project, arguing that despite its higher direct costs, it offers significant environmental advantages by lowering emissions and reducing social costs. They emphasized that the availability of wind energy at night allows for a reduction in natural gas generation, thereby minimizing fuel costs and greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, the company highlighted that the wind project mitigates risks associated with solar and storage tariffs and potential supply chain disruptions.

The meeting culminated in a recommendation to deliberate on whether to maintain the wind project in the resource portfolio or to replace it with solar options. Concerns over rate impacts were raised, leading to a suggestion to heed the recommendations from local stakeholders and potentially reject the proposed power purchase agreement for the wind project.